Mocking the Democracy

India needs one stern policy,"Any group or an individual who takes up arms against a Govt, either state or central, for any cause whatsoever, whoever supports them, individual/group, by providing media coverage, support in any form, financial, moral, medical, logistical should be automatically deemed a Terrorist Organisation without any deliberation. And such organizations must be punished ruthlessly." By taking arms, the cause is lost fundementally in a Democratic society. No cause can ever be achieved by armed struggle. We can look around our subcontinent for proof. And if you take China, the armed revolution has resulted in no basic human rights. Democratic, unarmed protestors were bulldozed in the heart of Beijing. Choosing to protest with violent means equates to threatening the Govt. A Govt should not let itself be threatened in any way. Threatening an elected govt mounts to mocking the Democarcy and the beliefs of the majority. The business of negotiating with such terror outfits should be summarily stopped. Talk to the govt but you cannot threaten the govt. Sitting at the negotiating table with an AK47 slung across the shoulder means, "do what I/We want or face my bullet". Take the classic example of AP. Negotiations are on with Naxals and the truce offered by the new govt is being freely used to rearm, recruit and regroup by the naxals. Our politicians will not learn lessons from the sacrifices being made by the police. The naxals tried to kill the former CM, who waged a war on naxals. The new CM decided to stop the war and talk to them. So the naxals have won what they needed. They brought the state to the negotiating table. Doesn't this mean an elected govt is feeling threatened by an armed group? The state has all the resources with them to crush this militancy. How many more such govt will buckle under the pressure of a gun? Put in the otherway, how many more times, we the people are going to elect such cowards. On the other side, the causes for such problems should be identified and corrected. I dont give a clean chit to the govt either. The dismal failures of successive govts in carrying out developmental works in the affected areas aggravated the situation. But armed struggle is no solution to any cause. Being the country where the Ahimsa was perfected just 50 years back, resorting armed struggle for a cause is very disturbing. An armed struggle can easily lose its track. Afghanistan, jihadis fought Soviets, then they fought among themselves. Now they fight the US. Tomorrow, who knows??? But what is sure is they will fight someone. A generation of warlords produces yet another one. A warlike situation kills every avenue to express your opinion and objective thinking. And hence such struggles never achieve their objective. With growing communication links, the armed groups form networks worldwide. Naxals in AP are in a joint venture with Nepali Maoists. Maoists fight Nepali govt backed by India. So the naxals are now conspiring against the Indian govt. Should we not term them as Anti-Nationals? Do we invite them for talks? Politicians, we know your are politicians because your are not good at anything else. What should we call the ones who elect them? ********, ******, **** !!!!